Roadblocks to Automated Testing Solutions and tools

Test Automation has become an indispensable part of every software development and testing project. Though, various industry studies show that 80% of test automation projects are failing while the other 20% are not yielding enough ROI.

Here are the top automation testing roadblocks:

Company Culture

Companies are still stuck without clarity of expectations between developers and software testers. Functional and unit testing need to be written so they can absorb changes without breaking. Test cases to be durable with time. Appreciate why tests break. Figure out what you need to do to make the tests more resilient.

You first have to test sites structures in place a lot like ours, where you are catching regressions and able to notify designers appropriately. At that point, you need clear procedures for what is done when regressions are diagnosed: that is assigned to fix them, how fast must they be resolved versus completing other tasks, what happens to ambiguous regressions (is the code incorrect or is the test wrong), etc.

We've seen a recurring type of dysfunction in numerous organizations: they have already built an automatic test system, but the noises from broken tests is drowning out the transmission from the working assessments, so everyone ignores the test system. That's more serious than having no automatic test infrastructure whatsoever. You have to actively maintain the tests and the people processes around them, or you wrap up on this dysfunction.

Legacy software and platforms. Clients trying to be cloud-native but still interfacing with mainframes. 2) Engineering culture. QA is viewed as a supplementary expert which is in reverse and wrong. Tooling becomes important, so you don't waste material developer time.

Companies who want to do the minimal testing required to get their certificate of insurance, so they may have coverage if they have a breach.

If perhaps there is bad communication between R&D and the automation team, then this can be bad for the new automation testing process. People are people. Possibly with the greatest level of technology, it always comes down to the people. When all of us are in synchronize, the technology (the automation) will succeed. Another concern is with the automation infrastructure - it should be versatile enough to accept any changes on the dev side of your product, keeping the maintenance to a minimum.

Having companies internalize and define what business metrics they would like to enhance. More about outcomes than outputs and tying to business value.

Multiple self-employed siloed approaches to tests in a single firm. Compliance and associated risk around changing legacy systems is challenging.

Manual Assessment

Tools are good these days. In which manual processes have recently been used, people need to be retrained. Just like DevOps. A cultural concern. Retraining required. Turning people into programmers - management doesn't want to ruffle feathers. A whole great deal of other processes in SDLC has been programmed and accelerated so QC doesn't slow the process.

Moving from manual to automated. Learn how to write tests. Manual testing is going to go away. Training and education aspect. Then to have your test and combine into the DevOps pipe. Companies run tests but don't look at results. Once you have them people struggle with inadequately written, not independent of other, timing dependent then ignore or disable. Points that are timing or environment dependent can be problematic.

Other

There was a time when folks failed to believe in testing. False any longer. Frontend assessment was obviously a thing few people did. Today can do visual variations. Make changes to CSS with full confidence. Looking at the system as a complete to obtain screenshots in code reviews to test the whole stack.

Need more technical skills. It's a matter of days for the manual tester to learn the skills they require. Selenium uses general 'languages' people are familiar with. Acceptance and development easy to build test package while building the applying to ensure the feature is bug-free. Plugged into CI/CD pipeline for deployment.

People have not fully understood the issue of failure and its impact. People with deep skills in networking don’t understand how things change when you go from a hardware world to a software world. The first wave of network testing automation has some failures.

Read more here